Is it me or my disorder? Authenticity in psychiatry
‘I don’t feel love for my partner any more: can I trust this feeling, or do I feel this way because of my depression?
‘Does my medication allow me to be myself, or am I just drugging myself to function better?’
Questions like these are omnipresent in psychiatry. For psychiatric disorders precisely pertain to how a person feels, thinks, perceives, and/or acts. This opens up the question of which thoughts and feelings are genuine expressions of me, and which are expressions of my disorder. As treatment is directed at those very same experiences, a parallel question arises here: is my medication only suppressing my symptoms, or is it (subtly) altering me? And: how can I tell?
While such questions are taken from psychiatric practice, they bear directly on philosophical issues and theories. For what does it mean to ‘be oneself’? Is there even such a thing as being ‘an authentic self’? This project develops an innovative philosophical, empirically sound theory of authenticity in psychiatry by combining philosophical analysis with qualitative research on the experiences of people who suffer from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
Specifically, I will (1) investigate MDD patients’ experiences of ‘ownness’ and ‘alienness’ with regard to their disorder and their treatment, (2) analyse philosophical theories of authenticity for dynamic, relational subjects and explore what a relational take on authenticity implies for the possibility of socially supported or ‘scaffolded’ authenticity, and (3) assess the implications of the concepts developed in (2) in the psychiatric context.
This research is funded by a VENI-grant from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), reference number 275-20-067.
Publications on Self-illness ambiguity & Relational authenticity in psychiatry
